Overview

An organization's competitive edge and the market differentiator pitch has a high dependency on its workforce. Furthermore, In a modern-day workforce, the Loyalty of an employee is measured based on his behavior and attitude, reflected as employee engagement than the number of years of service (Mohanty and Choudhury, 2018). Employee engagement plays a crucial role in achieving higher business outcomes in an organization, having a direct influence on productivity, profitability, and maturity of an organization (Kompaso and Sridevi, 2010).
A well-engaged workforce collaborates and contributes among them selfs to enhance higher personal performance as well as the combined team's performance (Alshammari, 2015).In contrast to that, a disengaged workforce works in silos than as a team lacks teamwork, motivation, and collaboration resulting in high employee turnover, low productivity, and reduced overall profits (Kompaso and Sridevi, 2010).

Studies have shown that both employees and employers have to put effort into a 2-way relationship to establish strong employee engagement (Kompaso and Sridevi, 2010). Therefore, an organization needs to have a solid platform in identifying what drives employee engagement and implement correct practices to facilitate to drive this behavior among its workforces (Singh, 2019). This blog post will critically analyze how best you can create a self engaged culture within your organization to derive a high-performance workforce.

Employee Engagement
Employee engagement is constructed with multiple dimensions and can be many ways of defining employee engagement. However, the dimensions associated with those definitions can be, either composite measurements or used as distinct dimensions (CHRISTIAN and SLAUGHTER, 2007). All of these dimensions gather around the investment of cognitive, emotional and physical energy of an employee towards an associated role to achieve organizational goals (Kahn, 1992). Saks (2006) has also stated, that employee engagement has been defined with the composition of the cognitive state of the employee, emotional perspective, and his behavioral aspect, in performing the current associate organization role. 
On the other hand, Armstrong and Taylor (2014) explain employee engagement from a different perspective in terms of Commitment, Motivation and Organization citizenship. As stated by Armstrong (2010), this model has been produced by the Institute of Employment Studies and presented in the below figure as IES model of employee engagement.
Figure 1
IES model of employee engagement
Source: (Armstrong et al, 2014)

As per Aktar (2019), a worldwide survey done by Gallup Consultancies in 1012, indicates that close to 2/3 of the employees(63%) are not engaged or motivated at their job, resulting in a decrease in performance. On the other hand, Rich, Lepine, and Crawford (2010) state that, employees who are engaged display higher performance by putting more cognitive, emotional and physicals energy into their work. Moreover, these employees are more focused, work as a team, connected, moreover satisfied with what they do as a part of their job role. Overall, the interrelationship that works performance has with employee engagement is significant Gallup (2012). So, understanding what drives engagement is a key to get the best out of your employees.

Drivers of Employee Engagement

As stated by Singh (2019), studies have shown that employee engagement is tightly coupled with several key factors in terms of drivers. These are,

·     Employee’s impression on the Organization
·     Trust based on past heuristics
·     Tasks associated with the current job role
·     Managers and their relationship with employees
·     Team environment
·     Enablement of employee personal development
·     Enablement of employee growth

Siddhanta and Roy ( 2010), also adds some additional factors which contribute to employee engagement such as, respect, transparency, recognition and rewards, Leadership, clarity in setting goals, enablement to perform work and motivation. On the other hand, based on several research findings worth of three deceases of research, Proactive Insights  (2014) has summarized the key drivers for employee engagement in to 10 universal factors. They call it “The Power of 10”. Below video will discuss these 10 drivers.
Video 1
Top 10 Drivers of Employee Engagement
Source: (Proactive Insights, 2014)

A study by Aon Hewitt has described the engagement of an employee as an employee's intellectual and emotional state, which simulates the employee to operate in an optimum efficiency (Kanwar, Soni and Sharma, 2017). As stated by Kanwar et al, Hewitt has also come up with a model which describes engaged employee in 3 main behaviors as described in below figure. These behaviors can be described as “Say, Stay and Strive”.
Figure 2

Aon Hewitt’s Employee Engagement Model
Source: (Aon Hewitt, 2015)

Aon Hewitt (2015) describes an engaged employee as someone who speaks positively about the organization and would not hesitate to recommend it. At the same time, he has a strong intend on having long term plans within the organization with minimum intention to leave. Also, the engagement employee is highly energetic to put extra effort in to make a successful outcome to the organization.

Conclusion

Employees are a key part of any organization. The full potential capacity of the workforce depends heavily on the fact that how willingly employees want to perform their assigned work to achieve organizational goals and objectives. Therefore, how engaged employees are, plays a crucial role in creating a high-performance workforce. Employee engagement has to be looked in mainly from an intellectual perspective in terms of employee's phycological attitude towards an organization, fellow employees, managers, and assigned role tasks. 

References

Al-dalahmeh, M., Masa’deh, R., Abu Khalaf, R. and Obeidat, B. (2018). The Effect of Employee Engagement on Organizational Performance Via the Mediating Role of Job Satisfaction: The Case of IT Employees in Jordanian Banking Sector. Modern Applied Science, [online] 12(6), p.17. Available at: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/mas/article/download/75309/41555 [Accessed 12 Aug. 2019].

Aktar, A. (2019). EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT:does it matter for employee performance?. THE COST AND MANAGEMENT, [online] 44(4), pp.27-35. Available at: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/6695/8b262e1685abdbcf137dec871e4af6ba2988.pdf [Accessed 9 Aug. 2019].

Armstrong, M. (2010). Evidence-based reward management. London: Kogan Page, p.41.

Armstrong, M. and Taylor, S. (2014). Armstrong's handbook of human resource management practice, 13th edition. 13th ed. London: Kogan Page, pp.192-202.

Alshammari, H. (2015). Workplace Productivity through Employee Workforce Engagement: A Review Study. International Journal of Business and Social Science, [online] 6(12), pp.156-160. Available at: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/ea75/e2fdf08e94c7b0df6f9d4bffa3bb9821bde6.pdf [Accessed 7 Aug. 2019].


CHRISTIAN, M. and SLAUGHTER, J. (2007). WORK ENGAGEMENT: A META-ANALYTIC REVIEW AND DIRECTIONS FOR RESEARCH IN AN EMERGING AREA. Academy of Management Proceedings, [online] 2007(1), pp.1-6. Available at:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/274755758_Work_engagement_A_meta-analytic_review_and_directions_for_research_in_an_emerging_area.

Fay, D., and Sonnentag, S. (2012), Within-Person Fluctuations of Proactive Behavior: How Affect and Experienced Competence Regulate Work Behavior. Human Performance, 25, 72- 93.

Gallup Consulting (2012). The Relationship Between Engagement at Work and Organizational Outcomes.Gallup Management Journal

Kahn, W. (1992). To Be Fully There: Psychological Presence at Work. Human Relations, [online] 45(4), pp.321-349. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/248106894_To_Be_Fully_There_Psychological_Presence_at_Work [Accessed 8 Aug. 2019].

Kompaso, S. and Sridevi, M. (2010). Employee Engagement: The Key to Improving Performance. International Journal of Business and Management, [online] 5(12), pp.89-94. Available at: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/0ca0/6a76e3f030dc2b58294498300c121fa4b112.pdf [Accessed 7 Aug. 2019].

Mohanty, M. and Choudhury, S. (2018). A Conceptual Model of Employee Engagement - From the perspective of Manufacturing Industry. RESEARCH REVIEW International Journal of Multidisciplinary, [online] 3(7), pp.290-295. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326572482_A_Conceptual_Model_of_Employee_Engagement_-_From_the_perspective_of_Manufacturing_Industry [Accessed 7 Aug. 2019].

Proactive Insights (2014). Top 10 Drivers of Employee Engagement. [video] Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EwVfBdlAUhU [Accessed 29 Aug. 2019].

Rich, B., Lepine, J. and Crawford, E. (2010). Job Engagement: Antecedents and Effects on Job Performance. Academy of Management Journal, [online] 53(3), pp.617-635. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/280294544_Job_Engagement_Antecedents_and_Effects_on_Job_Performance [Accessed 9 Aug. 2019]

Shantz,A.,Alfes, K.,Truss, C., & Soane, E. (2013).The role of employee engagement in the relationship between job design and task performance, citizenship and deviant behaviours. The International Journal of Human resource management, 24(13), 2608-2627.

Stephen P. Robbins (2009). Organizational Behaviour: International Version, 13/E. Pearson Higher Education

Saks, A. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(7), pp.600-619.

Siddhanta, A. and Roy, D. (2010). Employee engagement ­ Engaging the 21st century workforce. ASIAN JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT RESEARCH, [online] pp.173-174. Available at: http://www.ipublishing.co.in/ajmrvol1no1/sped12011/AJMRSP1015.pdf [Accessed 9 Aug. 2019].


Singh, Y. (2019). Employee Engagement as a Contemporary Issue in HRM--A Conceptual Framework. International Journal of Engineering and Management Research, [online] 6(5), pp.364-368. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/309563370_Employee_Engagement_as_a_Contemporary_Issue_in_HRM--A_Conceptual_Framework [Accessed 7 Aug. 2019].