Previous blog posts have discussed in detail on the aspect of creating a high-performance workforce via employee engagement by rationalizing employee engagement's effect on the organization’s performance. The blog has also explored the drivers for employee engagement by highlighting the need for employee motivation, satisfaction and its roots connecting to employee engagement. More importantly, exploring the best manner of applying the theories such as Maslow's Hierarchy of needs or Herzberg's 2-factor theory on the organization that I work for to improve employee motivation, and thereby creating a highly motivated and engaged workforce. Below is a summary of all of these posts, concluding the need for employee engagement to create a highly efficient, productive workforce.

As per Kompaso and Sridevi (2010), Employee engagement is an important parameter that has a significant impact on an organization's productivity, profitability. And also, it is evident that effective employee engagement in an organization gets established based on a strong 2-way relationship between the employee and the employer. Therefore, it is a mandatory practice that an organization has to invest in building a strong platform for identifying the drivers for engaging employees and facilitating correct methodologies to increase employee engagement (Singh, 2019).

While there are many factors affecting employee engagement, Armstrong and Taylor (2014) have grouped these factors into three main categories in the form of Commitment, Motivation and Organization citizenship. Further, they have also emphasized motivating the employees as a key influential category which has a direct impact on the other two groups.

As per Aruma, (2017), researcher Abraham Maslow has defined five hierarchal human needs, in the form of Basic needs, Safety needs, Love and Belonging related needs, Self-esteem needs, and Self-actualization which can drive employee motivation. Maslow has also stated that a successful employee motivation strategy should address the lowest levels of needs first before satisfying the top-level needs (Jerome, 2013).  As described in a previous blog post, an application of Maslow’s theory in the organization which I work for has provided insights that the theory can still be effectively applied to a modern-day day organization. 

Herzberg’s 2-factor theory is another useful theory to drive high employee satisfaction and negate employee dissatisfaction, therefore creating a highly engaged workforce by promoting a culture of highly satisfied motivated employees. (Baah and Amoako, 2011). As Owler and Morrison (2015) stated and also evident by applying the theory to the organization which I work for, finding the correct balance between the Hygiene factors and the Motivation factors is the key to find the optimum tune to achieve the maximum success the 2-factor theory.

On the other hand, setting effective goals can also be taken as a key methodology to focus on when creating high engagement among employees, resulting in their increased task performance (Shahin and Mahbod, 2006). According to Hursman (2010), defining the goals according to SMART characteristics will enable an organization to find the correct set of SMART goals/objectives.

As a conclusion, employees who feel happy at work will help to derive a high-performance culture. Motivating the employees, satisfying employee needs and assigning and assessing the employees with the correct set of effective goals are the approaches an organization can follow to achieve the desired outcomes.

References


Armstrong, M. and Taylor, S. (2014). Armstrong's handbook of human resource management practice, 13th edition. 13th ed. London: Kogan Page, pp.192-202.

Aruma, E. (2017). ABRAHAM MASLOW’S HIERARCHY OF NEEDS AND ASSESSMENT OF NEEDS IN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT. International Journal of Development and Economic Sustainability, [online] 5(7), pp.15-27. Available at: http://www.eajournals.org/wp-content/uploads/Abraham-Maslow%E2%80%99s-Hierarchy-of-Needs-and-Assessment-of-Needs-in-Community-Development.pdf [Accessed 10 Sep. 2019].

Aktar, A. (2019). EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT:does it matter for employee performance?. THE COST AND MANAGEMENT, [online] 44(4), pp.27-35. Available at: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/6695/8b262e1685abdbcf137dec871e4af6ba2988.pdf [Accessed 9 Aug. 2019].

Baah, K. and Amoako, G. (2011). Application of Frederick Herzberg’s Two-Factor theory in assessing and understanding employee motivation at work: a Ghanaian Perspective. European Journal of Business and Management, [online] 3(9), pp.1-7. Available at: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/8120/9583968b25d38e08f353aef4004be7cd099c.pdf [Accessed 18 Sep. 2019].

Hursman, A. (2010). Measure What Matters. Information Management, [online] 20(4), p.24. Available at: http://connection.ebscohost.com/c/articles/52725168/measure-what-matters [Accessed 25 Sep. 2019].

Jerome, N. (2013). Application of the Maslow’s hierarchy of need theory; impacts and implications on organizational culture, human resource and employee’s performance. International Journal of Business and Management Invention, [online] 2(3), pp.39-45. Available at: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/b0bc/c8ca45193eaf700350a8ac2ddfc09a093be8.pdf [Accessed 10 Sep. 2019].

Kompaso, S. and Sridevi, M. (2010). Employee Engagement: The Key to Improving Performance. International Journal of Business and Management, [online] 5(12), pp.89-94. Available at: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/0ca0/6a76e3f030dc2b58294498300c121fa4b112.pdf [Accessed 7 Aug. 2019].

Owler, K. and Morrison, R. (2015). What makes work enjoyable and motivating for Learning Advisors in Aotearoa-New Zealand?. Association of Tertiary Learning Advisors Aotearoa/New Zealand Journal, [online] 1(1), pp.16-33. Available at: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/99a5/eea366617653d0e957e4bbb3cce0b93c6d7b.pdf.

Shahin, A. and Mahbod, M. (2006). Prioritization of key performance indicators. An integration of analytical hierarchy process and goal setting. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, [online] 5(3), pp.226-240. Available at: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/488f/f5fa5ca4e146f3fe41362b2c77604e03b439.pdf [Accessed 25 Sep. 2019].

Singh, Y. (2019). Employee Engagement as a Contemporary Issue in HRM--A Conceptual Framework. International Journal of Engineering and Management Research, [online] 6(5), pp.364-368. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/309563370_Employee_Engagement_as_a_Contemporary_Issue_in_HRM--A_Conceptual_Framework [Accessed 7 Aug. 2019].